TL;DR
Get bike and ride gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Malibu says four speed cameras recorded about 100,000 speeding infractions during a 10-day trial in September, mostly in eastern parts of the city. The city has delayed the planned warning period while it studies traffic patterns and makes installation changes; the trial readings have not resulted in warnings or citations.
Malibu has delayed the warning period for its planned speed-camera pilot after four cameras recorded about 100,000 speeding infractions during a 10-day trial in September, according to local officials. The trial readings did not lead to warnings or citations, and the city says it is reviewing traffic patterns and making installation changes before enforcement begins.
The cameras were tested in parts of Malibu, a city that stretches east to west along Pacific Coast Highway. City officials said most of the recorded infractions came from eastern Malibu. The reported total is an approximate count from the 10-day trial; the available account does not provide a breakdown by camera, roadway, day or speed.
Malibu had planned to begin a warning period after the trial. Instead, officials delayed that step to study traffic patterns in Carbon Canyon and Tuna Canyon, and to complete changes needed for installation. The city told KTLA that it would continue evaluating the trial information with the aim of implementing the program in support of public safety.
The cameras were operating during the test and could flash when a vehicle passed, but no enforcement action was taken. The city said the cameras were not issuing warnings or citations, accessing driver information from the Department of Motor Vehicles, or taking other enforcement action during the trial.
What Malibu’s Trial Could Change
The trial suggests the planned system could record speeding on a large scale along roads where Malibu is considering enforcement. But 100,000 readings are not the same as 100,000 issued tickets: they were trial detections, and the city says no drivers were cited. The figure also does not, on its own, explain how many separate vehicles were involved or how often a driver may have been recorded.
For residents and drivers, the delay means the city is not yet applying the proposed penalties. The review may also affect how and when the pilot begins, including whether the city changes its installation or approach after examining the locations with many recorded infractions. Malibu has described the program as a public-safety measure focused on speeding, with Pacific Coast Highway a principal target.
The distinction between a recorded reading and a penalty matters for public understanding and accountability. The city has said it will report program performance and data to the Public Safety Commission and the public. Those reports could provide information needed to judge where violations occur and how the system operates once it is active.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How the Proposed Penalties Work
Under the city’s proposed rules, a driver would be subject to enforcement at 11 mph or more over the speed limit. The stated graduated penalties are $50 for driving 11 to 15 mph over the limit, $100 for 16 to 25 mph over, and $200 for 26 mph or more over. The source report also lists a $500 penalty for speeds of 100 mph or more; the relationship between that amount and the 26-mph-or-more category was not further explained in the material provided.
A September city newsletter said the program would not add license points or insurance penalties. It also said revenue would go toward system costs and Pacific Coast Highway safety activity, and that program performance and data would be reported to the Public Safety Commission and the public. These are descriptions of the proposed program, not outcomes established by the trial.
The trial took place before the planned warning phase, and the city has not yet started issuing warnings or citations through the cameras. The current delay is tied to further evaluation of traffic patterns in specific areas and installation work, rather than to penalties imposed on drivers during the test.
“The cameras are not currently issuing warnings or citations, accessing driver information from the DMV, or taking enforcement action.”
— City of Malibu, in a statement reported by KTLA
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Questions Behind the Trial Count
The reported total is approximate, and available information does not specify how the 100,000 readings were counted, whether repeat detections of the same vehicle are included, or how the observations were distributed across the four cameras. It also does not provide the recorded speeds or the share of readings that would meet the proposed threshold for a penalty.
The city has not announced a revised date for the warning period or a firm start date for enforcement. It is also not clear what changes the traffic studies or installation work may prompt, or whether the proposed rules will be adjusted before launch. The trial figure should not be treated as a count of unique drivers or actual violations that have been penalized.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
City Review Before Enforcement
Malibu says it will continue reviewing the trial data, studying traffic patterns in Carbon Canyon and Tuna Canyon, and completing necessary installation changes. The planned warning period remains delayed while that work proceeds. The city has not provided a new schedule in the material reported by The Drive and KTLA.
When the program moves forward, the city says it intends to report performance and data to the Public Safety Commission and the public. Those updates should clarify when warnings or citations begin and how the camera system performs after the trial. Until then, the recorded readings remain non-enforcement trial results, not issued penalties.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
Did Malibu issue 100,000 speeding tickets?
No. The cameras recorded about 100,000 speeding infractions during a 10-day trial, but the city said they were not issuing warnings or citations and took no enforcement action during that period.
Why was the warning period delayed?
Malibu said it is studying traffic patterns in Carbon Canyon and Tuna Canyon and completing installation changes before moving ahead. The city has not announced a replacement date.
Where were most trial readings recorded?
City officials said most of the recorded infractions came from eastern Malibu. The available report does not give a camera-by-camera or roadway-by-roadway breakdown.
What penalties are proposed once enforcement begins?
The proposed schedule starts at $50 for speeds 11 to 15 mph over the limit, rises to $100 for 16 to 25 mph over, and lists $200 for 26 mph or more over. The report also lists $500 for speeds of 100 mph or more. The city newsletter said no license points or insurance penalties would apply.
When will the cameras begin issuing warnings or citations?
No new start date has been announced in the reported information. The city says it is continuing traffic studies and installation work before implementing the program.
Source: rss
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
